August 06, 2003

Media or Medusa?

It occurs to me that had the Episcopalians been clever with their scheduling, they could have buried the vote on Bishop Robinson under the avalanche of Kobe Bryant coverage.

A couple of pertinent essays: they were both written during the Jayson Blair/Howard Raines fiasco at the Times, but the sentiments fit the current situation as well.

From Time magazine: the press is too smug.

...many big-media journalists are now cautious, well-paid conformists distant from their audiences and more responsive to urban elites, powerful people and megacorporations — especially the ones they work for. Hence the bland news anchors who verge on self-parody; magazines so commercial they're practically catalogs; timid pack journalism (We love dotcoms too! I mean, we never believed in them either!); local newscasts shilling for their corporate parents ("Up next: the hottest Survivor finale parties! Plus, the rest of the news!"); saturation coverage of trials-of-the-minute and movies we know will be lousy but will have big opening weekends. Yes, people watch and buy all this stuff. That doesn't mean they respect it. They see a profession that acts excited about a lot — Laci Peterson, The Matrix Reloaded, political horse races — but cares about nothing.

This one's from new media;

Unfortunately, the business right now resembles a herd of sheep. Many editors assign pieces more to impress their fellow editors than to serve the needs of the public. When I read the pile-on of attack pieces about the New York Times, I hear a distant baaa.

Add to it the fact that it's August, traditionally a slow month for news, and what do you get? Legal analysts on ESPN and religion analysts on the major networks and cable.

Posted by Linkmeister at August 6, 2003 01:19 PM
Comments