From the LA Times:
How did the debate influence your voting plans?
2.6%
I was for Bush — I'm still for Bush.
(649 responses)
0.2%
I was for Bush — I'm now undecided.
(45 responses)
12.0%
I was for Bush — I'm now leaning to Kerry
(2990 responses)
64.9%
I was for Kerry — I'm still for Kerry.
(16125 responses)
0.1%
I was for Kerry — I'm now undecided.
(37 responses)
0.5%
I was for Kerry — I'm now leaning to Bush.
(116 responses)
0.2%
I was undecided — I'm still undecided.
(58 responses)
0.6%
I was undecided — I'm now leaning to Bush.
(140 responses)
18.9%
I was undecided — I'm now leaning to Kerry.
(4699 responses)
24859 total responses
Can the Los Angeles Times readership be that pro-Kerry, or is there something going on here? If it were the San Francisco Chronicle, I could understand these results better; after all, Baghdad-by-the-Bay is famously liberal. Los Angeles is far more conservative. California's a blue state anyway, but those undecideds now leaning to Kerry are interesting.
Posted by Linkmeister at October 9, 2004 12:01 AMWell, my aunt was very, very pro Bush..
After the two debates she is switching to Kerry...
Doesn't trust Bush....
Good for her!
Posted by: Linkmeister at October 10, 2004 10:08 PM