October 09, 2004

Debate 2 poll

From the LA Times:

How did the debate influence your voting plans?

2.6%
I was for Bush — I'm still for Bush.
(649 responses)

0.2%
I was for Bush — I'm now undecided.
(45 responses)

12.0%
I was for Bush — I'm now leaning to Kerry
(2990 responses)

64.9%
I was for Kerry — I'm still for Kerry.
(16125 responses)

0.1%
I was for Kerry — I'm now undecided.
(37 responses)

0.5%
I was for Kerry — I'm now leaning to Bush.
(116 responses)

0.2%
I was undecided — I'm still undecided.
(58 responses)

0.6%
I was undecided — I'm now leaning to Bush.
(140 responses)

18.9%
I was undecided — I'm now leaning to Kerry.
(4699 responses)

24859 total responses

Can the Los Angeles Times readership be that pro-Kerry, or is there something going on here? If it were the San Francisco Chronicle, I could understand these results better; after all, Baghdad-by-the-Bay is famously liberal. Los Angeles is far more conservative. California's a blue state anyway, but those undecideds now leaning to Kerry are interesting.

Posted by Linkmeister at October 9, 2004 12:01 AM
Comments

Well, my aunt was very, very pro Bush..
After the two debates she is switching to Kerry...
Doesn't trust Bush....

Posted by: toxiclabrat at October 10, 2004 04:35 PM

Good for her!

Posted by: Linkmeister at October 10, 2004 10:08 PM