February 19, 2005

Explain invading Iraq again, willya?

"There was hope of a secular Iraq, even after the occupation. That hope is fading fast."

So concludes Riverbend, in yesterday's post. How does she arrive at that conclusion?

It’s not about a Sunni government or a Shia government- it’s about the possibility of an Iranian-modeled Iraq. Many Shia are also appalled with the results of the elections. There’s talk of Sunnis being marginalized by the elections but that isn’t the situation. It’s not just Sunnis- it’s moderate Shia and secular people in general who have been marginalized.

The list is frightening- Da’awa, SCIRI, Chalabi, Hussein Shahristani and a whole collection of pro-Iran political figures and clerics. They are going to have a primary role in writing the new constitution. There’s talk of Shari’a, or Islamic law, having a very primary role in the new constitution. The problem is, whose Shari’a? Shari’a for many Shia differs from that of Sunni Shari’a. And what about all the other religions? What about Christians and Mendiyeen?


They try to give impressive interviews to western press but the situation is wholly different on the inside. Women feel it the most. There’s an almost constant pressure in Baghdad from these parties for women to cover up what little they have showing. There’s a pressure in many colleges for the segregation of males and females. There are the threats, and the printed and verbal warnings, and sometimes we hear of attacks or insults.

You feel it all around you. It begins slowly and almost insidiously. You stop wearing slacks or jeans or skirts that show any leg because you don’t want to be stopped in the street and lectured by someone who doesn’t approve. You stop wearing short sleeves and start preferring wider shirts with a collar that will cover up some of you neck. You stop letting your hair flow because you don’t want to attract attention to it. On the days when you forget to pull it back into a ponytail, you want to kick yourself and you rummage around in your handbag trying to find a hair band… hell, a rubber band to pull back your hair and make sure you attract less attention from *them*.

Remember how proudly George and Laura Bush spoke of women's reaffirmed rights in Afghanistan? And how we invaded Iraq (the latest stated reason, anyway) to bring "justice and freedom" to the country? Do those paragraphs above imply "justice and freedom" to you?

Read it and weep.

Posted by Linkmeister at February 19, 2005 02:51 PM

Why should anybody take anything s/he says seriously? No public appearances, no interviews, and no disclosure. She's the insurgent version of Kaycee Nicole, without the charm.

Bah, humbug.

Posted by: Alwin Hawkins at February 19, 2005 03:51 PM

Well, maybe. Nonetheless, it's hard to look at the results of those elections and not think an Iran-centric government is the likely result, with all the incumbent theocracy that might entail.

Posted by: Linkmeister at February 19, 2005 04:41 PM

In a 2-party system, sure. But if I remember correctly, the Shiia need the Kurds to form a government. If that's the case, I'd disagree with your conclusion.

Posted by: Alwin Hawkins at February 20, 2005 02:08 AM