May 17, 2005

Moyers on Tomlinson and the CPB

Bill Moyers spoke at the second National Conference on Media Reform a few days ago. It was his first opportunity to publicly address the goings-on at the Corporation for Public Broadcasting. Here he is on the idiotic "on the one hand, on the other hand" journalism we see so much of:

Objectivity was not satisfied by two opposing people offering competing opinions, leaving the viewer to split the difference. I came to believe that objective journalism means describing the object being reported on, including the little fibs and fantasies, as well as the big lie of people in power.

In no way – in no way does this permit journalists to make accusations and allegations. It means, instead, making sure that your reporting and your conclusions can be nailed to the post with confirming evidence.

This is always hard to do, but it’s never been harder. Without a trace of irony, the powers that be have appropriated the Newspeak vernacular of George Orwell’s 1984. They give us a program vowing no child will be left behind, while cutting funds for educating disadvantaged children; they give us legislation cheerily calling for clear skies and healthy forests that give us neither, while turning over our public lands to the energy industry. In Orwell’s 1984 the character Syme, one of the writers of that totalitarian society’s dictionary, explains to the protagonist, Winston, “Don’t you see? Don’t you see that the whole aim of Newspeak is to narrow the range of thought? Has it ever occurred to you, Winston, that by the year 2050 at the very latest, not a single human being will be alive who could understand such a conversation as we’re having right now. The whole climate of thought,” he said, “will be different. In fact, there will be no thought as we understand it now. Orthodoxy means not thinking, not needing to think. Orthodoxy is unconsciousness.”

Hear me: an unconscious people, an indoctrinated people, a people fed only partisan information and opinion that confirm their own bias, a people made morbidly obese in mind and spirit by the junk food of propaganda is less inclined to put up a fight, ask questions and be skeptical. And just as a democracy can die of too many lies, that kind of orthodoxy can kill us, too.

Here he is on CPB:

I thought the current CPB board would like to hear and talk about the importance of standing up to political interference. I was wrong. They wouldn’t meet with me. I tried three times and failed three times, and it was all downhill after that. I was naive, I guess. I simply never imagined that any CPB chairman, Democrat or Republican, would cross the line from resisting White House pressure to carrying out for the White House. But that’s what Kenneth Tomlinson has been doing. On Fox News this week he denied he’s carrying out a White House mandate or that he’s ever had any conversation with any Bush administration official about PBS. But The New York Times reports that he enlisted Karl Rove to help kill a proposal that would have put on the CPB board people with experience in local radio and television.

It was also reported that on the recommendation of administration officials, he hired a White House flack -- I know the genre -- named Mary Catherine Andrews, as a senior staff member at CPB. While she was still reporting to Karl Rove at the White House, she set up CPB’s new ombudsman office and had a hand in hiring the two people who will fill it, one of them who once worked for Tomlinson, the other a very respected journalist. But this is an anomaly. A political organization can’t have an ombudsman. CPB is not a journalistic or newsgathering organization. PBS can have one. WGBH can have one. WNET can have one. But for a political organization to have two ombudsmen or one ombudsman or a dozen? I would like to give Mr. Tomlinson the benefit of the doubt, but I can’t.

The whole thing is worth reading. Twice. Then maybe you should forward the link to the heads of your local public radio and public television stations, asking them to stand firm against the new regime at the Corporation for Public Broadcasting. I know I'm going to.

Posted by Linkmeister at May 17, 2005 12:01 AM
Comments

Hi Linkmeister, I watched Moyers' speech on C-Span twice. It made me cry.

It's corny, but I loved the part where he said the American Eagle needs both a right wing and a left wing to stay in flight. Just one wing -- and it's going to crash.

I've always believed that -- bring the best (and worst) of both sides together to create compromise and balance.

Our country, as we've known it all our lives, is crumbling before our eyes.

I want to see if we can buy the DVD -- I'm going to get it -- So, when people fall further and further into unconsciousness, I'll use it as a lifeline to keep my head above water.

You know how you said a couple of weeks ago that the Democrats are busy with Social Security and the Filibuster? They have to focus on everything! Where's our progressive army? We can't only "hit back" -- we need to be on the offensive! (Gee, that kind of sounds like THEM~! - Sorry!) -- But, I believe it's true.

We're constantly playing defense and we're getting killed.

Posted by: blue girl at May 17, 2005 04:34 AM

"Kenneth Tomlinson has his demanding donors. I’ll take the widow’s mite any day." I'll start believing him, as well as take him up on his offer, when he says he would rather have the $500 than the $400 million from Uncle Sam. See Raging Bill

Posted by: pbswatcher at May 18, 2005 06:23 PM