August 11, 2006

Exploitation of terror

So it comes out that our boys in the White House were warned about the terrorist plot and the upcoming raid. Well, that's reasonable. What's appalling is their reaction.

"It is a mistake to believe there is no threat to the United States of America," he [Bush] said. "We've taken a lot of measures to protect the American people. But obviously we still aren't completely safe."

His remarks came a day after the White House orchestrated an exceptionally aggressive campaign to tar opposition Democrats as weak on terrorism, knowing what Democrats didn't: News of the plot could soon break.

[snip]

Snow said Bush first learned in detail about the plot on Friday, and received two detailed briefings on it on Saturday and Sunday, as well as had two conversations about it with British Prime Minister Tony Blair.

[snip]

On Wednesday, Cheney had suggested that Democrats believe "that somehow we can retreat behind our oceans and not be actively engaged in this conflict and be safe here at home, which clearly we know we won't, we can't, be," he said.

While some Democrats have opposed some steps in the war on terrorism, and more and more are calling for a withdrawal from Iraq, no major figures in the party have called for a wholesale retreat in the broader conflict. (Emphasis added)

But Bush's Republicans hoped the raid would yield political gains.

"I'd rather be talking about this than all of the other things that Congress hasn't done well," one Republican congressional aide told AFP on condition of anonymity because of possible reprisals.

"Weeks before September 11th, this is going to play big," said another White House official, who also spoke on condition of not being named, adding that some Democratic candidates won't "look as appealing" under the circumstances.

To these guys, terrorism is nothing more than a political tool. Noticed any improvements in your port security lately? How about that nuclear plant down the road? Is it safeguarded?

Even Richard Nixon wasn't this despicable.

Posted by Linkmeister at August 11, 2006 12:01 AM | TrackBack
Comments

Where is Bush? Still on the ranch????
Ya know, you can stop all the liquid on a plane as much as you'd like, but people still have to urinate.
Just wondering if that could be used as the agent to make an explosive.....

Posted by: toxiclabrat at August 11, 2006 05:21 AM

here's something that negates counter-terrorism measures. If the banned items are so suspect why wouldn't they be isolated in a bomb proof containment vessel?

Posted by: RONW at August 11, 2006 01:29 PM

Not to mention that explosives in liquids might explode when commingled.

Posted by: Linkmeister at August 11, 2006 02:05 PM